Man in Search of Humanity
By Mahboob A. Khawaja, PhD
All wars are waged for profits and plunder and constitute crimes against humanity. History tells the truth that herd like passion perpetuates warmongering – killing of the same mankind. The ongoing conflicts between Israel and Palestinian people are no exception but camouflaged record of absurd lies, deceptions and failed leadership. If intelligent leaders were to come in the future, coming generations might term it absurd and utterly foolish that while Jews and Muslims had so much in common; they lived in distrust and wasted time and energies during decades-old fear of the unknown. They breathe the same oxygen so close but find themselves operative in conflicting time zones. The mankind is paying with pains to systematic conflict-making and conflict-keeping policies maintained and applauded by the leading military powers of the globe. Man and humanity are striving to survive against manipulative and highly dangerous military odds, not seen in the living history. Nobody can predict with certainty how the future will unfold for peace and co-existence, not just in the predominantly Arab Middle East but its uncontrollable consequences for the whole of the mankind.
When people live in constant fear and conflicts, they lose sense of normal thinking to arrive at rational perceptions, behaviors and decision making. Israelis and Palestinians both share this dysfunctional value for over half of a century. Late Professor Edward Said was a unique proactive intellectual and scholars to look beyond the immediate box and offer new visions and peaceful means to reapproach the Israel-Palestine conflicts. Despite his forcible eviction from his family home in Jerusalem, he was a keen proponent of peaceful co-existence. No wonder, few on both sides of the conflicting time zones ever listened to the voices of reason. Israelis appear to be diverse in their ethnic, social and cultural composition whereas, Palestinians enjoin cultural homogeneity but lack of systematic political unity until now how to address the multiple issues in dealing with their freedom and future. Despite diversity, Israelis enjoin unity of purpose, political system and governance to protect their nationhood and identity by overwhelmingly military means. At issues are the end of occupation of certain parts of Palestine and establishment of an independent State of Palestine and demarcation of the borders as of the 1967 to facilitate co-existence between the Two States in the Arab Middle East. During the 1967 war, Israel as usual a military powerful state occupied large chunk of the land which Palestinians claim for their statehood.
This week at the UN General Assembly meeting, the feverish tensions grew out of context and blame game generated utmost intellectual absurdity. The American politicians and Western news media poured-in bundle of lies and systematic falsification of the history. Warning Mahmoud Abbas not to go for statehood at the UN. Nobody ever mentioned a word that this is how the State of Israel came into existence in 1948. So what is alarming or unusual for the Palestine State to be – a symbolic entity, if nothing else in real world? For over 21 years, both parties have held direct-indirect peace talks but ending up in failure as Israel is unwilling to end the occupation. Most often Israel has powerful political lobbyists in Washington and Western Europe to show indifference to global concerns. Since their peace talks and the Oslo agreement, Israelis and Palestinians have come to realize that military absolutism will not pave the way for peaceful resolution of their standings. They do need face to face dialogue to bridge the differences. America holds a decisive role in making this peace deal come true as did President Carter and President Clinton in the past. The other part of the problems rest with the Arab geopolitics. Oil exporting enriched Arab leaders do not offer any substantial political presence either to America or to Israel to straighten out the much old-fashioned militarized politics. The neighboring Arab states lack moral and intellectual leadership, they have no public institutions to think or to analyze the prevalent facts of human affairs what is rational or practical in dealing with the State of Israel. Religiously Arabs have strong bonds to Judaism and the teachings of Moses; most often these unknown factors remain unknown in articulating the national policies and workable alternatives to complex problems. Global politics is not one-way street but combination of known and unknown ideas and ideals to tackle situations of adversities and conflicting interests. Not so, to the Arab leadership, they lack proactive and educated people to come up with new and innovative strategies. Often Arab people in streets are more knowledgeable and have active passion for change and new leadership to harmonize the affairs in global politics and making of a different kind of future. But the leaders live in palaces, not with people to know the realities of life. The Arab masses have prominent role to change the absurd politics and carve-up a more favorable and sustainable political future. To do so, the tribal cult Arab leaders would need a jolt as it happened recently to replace Hosni Mubarak in Egypt, Abdullah of Yemen, Ali of Tunisia, Qaddafi and very soon to Bashar al–Assad in Syria.
Phenomenon of Change is ahead of us. To make it happen through planned ideas and ideals for peace and co-existence, Israelis and Palestinians would need to assess their strengths and weaknesses for workable political change. Both should analyze a concrete framework of future – the facts not fictions of life that warrant change by peaceful means not by military adventures, certainly not by grabbing Palestinian lands to built more settlements. There are historical gaps in thinking and understanding each others viewpoint, cultural norms, common human values to know and understand one another without agreeing or disagreeing, just being open to listening and learning – the way to built a sustainable culture of THINKING to co-exist. Israelis are not going anywhere; Palestinians cannot be buried alive by Israeli bombardments on Gaza or elsewhere. Increasing Israeli military check posts across Palestine and self-determined barbed wire marked frontiers remind the mankind of the Nazi’s political culture – the Jewish holocaust experience, is it a replica of the history that Israelis want to show to the 21st century informed mankind. Surely, their kind of liberal democracy is in desperate need of redefining. Palestinians need new proactive and intelligent leadership to organize the unity of purpose and be able to conduct rational negotiations, be it with the Israelis or the global communities asserting political influence.
Dr. Ludwig Watzal (“Israel: Perpetrator or Self-proclaimed Victim?” Dissident Voice: 1121/2012) a prominent journalist attempts to explain how Israeli propaganda has put the blame on Hamas for the recent bombing of Gaza. He refers to a statement made by the Israeli Minister of Interior Eli Yishai: “The goal of the operation is to send Gaza back to the middle Ages. Only then will Israel be calm for forty years.” If that holds true we could see a fight between the Israeli version of “enlightenment” and the Palestinian “forces of darkness”. That the “sophisticated” West doesn’t reject this rhetoric nonsense outright should make the audience wonder. The future of the Near and the Middle East will be brighter than ever.”
Internationally acclaimed journalist Roberts Fisk (“Benjamin Netanyahu Is Leading Israel Into Isolation” The Iron Dome kept missiles at bay, but another 'dome' shields the people from reality. The Independent: 11/25/2012) asks “do they want peace?”
"Things went wrong when we allowed the settlers to go into the territories in 1968, ……and of course, those massive colonies built on Arab land – for Jews and Jews only – now lie at the heart of the Israeli dilemma. Does the country want peace? Or does it want Greater Israel?
In an Open Letter to President Obama (Washington Report on the Middle East, 11/2012), a Jewish Sister offered the following staunch reminder:
“Dear Mr. President,
My younger brother was an early believer in you. He worked for your Senate campaign. he was working on your campaign again when he died suddenly, a brilliant, energetic 29 year old, dead in his tracks. You know this. You called my parents.
You may not know that after his sudden passing, many of his friends quit their jobs, moved, changed their lives to continue working on your campaign in his memory. …Until yesterday. Mr. President, when the bombs began raining on Gaza again and you reiterated Israel’s “right to defend itself”, I took that sticker off my jacket. Later, you called Prime Minister Netanyahu and asked him to “use restraint,” as though he were a glutton at a feast, rather than an elected official of a powerful military nation, using your own country’s weaponry to engage in a one-sided assault. Mr. President, you are the most powerful man in the world. You do not need to politely request anything of Mr. Netanyahu; you can stop him by ending U.S. military aid to Israel until Israel complies with international and U.S. law…… We voted for you. We fund-raised for you. We do not want to watch you pretend like it is for us that you allow these massacres to continue with our money. My brother would be disappointed to see your impotence in the face of continuing Israeli aggression shortly after such a sweeping re-election victory. I am still proud of him. I am still proud of all of the Americans that worked so hard to deliver you this re-election. But I am so hurt and ashamed to watch you use restraint when you are the only person with the power to stop this massacre. Mr. President, I am barely over 5 feet tall and I am not afraid of AIPAC; why are you?”
Out of desperation and purely for short-terms political gains, Israeli PM Netanyahu and other politicians are using aggressive means and provocative practices to plan more illegal settlements on the occupied areas. Strange as is that new Jewish settlers can come from all over the world to build homes on the stolen land but Palestinians refugees cannot return to their own homes and land occupied by other people. The global humanity is neither dumb nor blind to know the facts on the ground. These moves simply cause more conflicts and disasters, not helpful to make peace between divergent parties in the conflict. Israelis and Palestinians are overwhelmingly emotionally charged people, often lacking rational mode of thinking compatible to the global political affairs. Israelis is strong military power, have atomic weapons and backing of the US bought politicians, yet, they cannot impose their will on others nor foresee promising future. Palestinians have natural bonds to their ancestral homes and lands and an unconquerable will power to encounter all adversities. Both parties must THINK ANEW for a promising Future to co-exist. This is what late Professor Edward Said dreamed of throughout his life. He wanted to go back to Jerusalem, his ancestral home taken by force by the Zionist settlers. After the cruelty of the 2WW, mankind is acutely aware that wars and killings do not determine the future of nations; they destroy all possibilities of rethinking and re-living together as dignified human beings, the most intelligent creatures of God to live on Earth. History cannot be ignored for its role to teach us the consequences of sadistic warmongering – often perpetrated by the few but victimizing the whole of the mankind. Time and opportunities do exist for serious thoughts and consideration on both sides to reach a peaceful conclusion for sustainable future. Global community is not haphazard but mindful of all the developments take shape and form. What happens between Israel and Palestinians will have direct ramifications for the whole world. Would reason and truth prevail over wrong thinking and wrong actions? Would the two proponent of Abrahmic monotheistic faith be able to co-exist in the Middle East? Would rationality replace animosity for the good of all mankind? Would the new generations of educated and intelligent leaders on both sides view the future as promising to make peace rather than wars? Would the Israeli occupation end soon and Palestinian be able to establish an independent State of Palestine? If they continue to follow the past dead-ended polices and practices, what narrations would the story tellers compile for the future children:
As a young poet, Wilfred Owen (“Dulce et decorum est”), once observed:
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori.